(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-30 05:52 am (UTC)
Wow. That's a damned shame. I was looking forward to the game, since I'm usually a big fan of Bethesda's games (they made the Elder Scrolls series, for heaven's sake). I've been reading over the Wikipedia article on the game and it seems like a complete loss. What a wasted opportunity.

...........................

Also, I second the recommendation for Master of Orion, but only for MOO2.

The first Master of Orion game is good, but it's DOS-based and lacks a lot of the polish the second game displays.

The second game is simply amazing, and I still play it even today (after installing a new operating system on a PC, the first thing to be installed is always MOO2). Still, it's over ten years old and that shows in a lot of ways.

The third game is a huge disappointment. Just don't bother with it.

If you play the second game and feel like you need something a little more modern (I'll be the first to admit that MOO2 is a tad dated), I would recommend picking up Galactic Civilizations or Galactic Civilizations II, along with their requisite expansions. They shouldn't be too expensive, either - Stardock is pretty good about bundle pricing.

Of course, if you don't like empire-spanning turn-based strategy games, then these are probably moot recommendations.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

January 2012

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
1516 171819 2021
22232425 26 2728
293031    

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags